|
Editorial Review "I know the liberals call you 'the most dangerous man in America,' but don't worry about it, they used to say the same thing about me. Keep up the good work." -Ronald Reagan in a letter to Rush Limbaugh, December 11, 1992
Do you remember your first time?
People tend to remember the moment they first heard The Rush Limbaugh Show on the radio. For Zev Chafets, it was in a car in Detroit, driving down Woodward Avenue. Limbaugh's braggadocio, the outrageous satire, the slaughtering of liberal sacred cows performed with the verve of a rock-n-roll DJ-it seemed fresh, funny and completely subversive. "They're never going to let this guy stay on the air," he thought.
Almost two decades later Chafets met Rush for the first time, at Limbaugh's rarely visited "Southern Command." They spent hours together talking on the record about politics, sports, music, show business, religion and modern American history. Rush opened his home and his world, introducing Chafets to his family, closest friends, even his psychologist. The result was an acclaimed cover-story profile of Limbaugh in The New York Times Magazine.
But there was much more to say, especially after Limbaugh became Public Enemy Number One of the Obama Administration. At first Limbaugh resisted the idea of a full-length portrait, but he eventually invited Chafets back to Florida and exchanged more than a hundred emails full of his personal history, thoughts, fears and ambitions. What has emerged is an uniquely personal look at the man who is not only the most popular voice on the radio, but the leader of the conservative movement and one of the most influential figures in the Republican Party.
While Limbaugh's public persona is instantly recognizable, his background and private life are often misunderstood. Even devoted Dittoheads will find there's a lot they don't know about the self-described "harmless little fuzzball" who has, over the years, taken on the giants of the mainstream media and the Democratic Party-from Bill and Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama-with "half his brain tied behind his back, just to make it fair." Chafets paints a compelling portrait of Limbaugh as a master entertainer, a public intellectual, a political force, and a fascinating man. ... Read more Reviews
My "Army of One" experience, May 27, 2010
I received the book from Amazon as I arrived home yesterday evening. I was obviously pleasantly surprised as displayed by the picture I sent to both of you. The irony was not lost on me either, as a book about Rush Limbaugh, defender and champion of the private sector was actually delivered ahead of "shed"-ule, (not to be confused with "sked"-ule) and un-damaged by that wonderful government program - The U.S. Postal Service. Who knew?!?
The book is about 210 pages long and is an easy and enjoyable read. I read it start to finish on the back patio in about 4 hours, where I smoked two Churchill's (La Gloria Cubana Serie R No. 7), consumed three "adult beverages" (Laphroaig single malt scotch), and wore my Club Gitmo t-shirt ("Your tropical retreat from the stress of Jihad").
For ditto-heads who are everyday listeners, much of the material covered about the show is already known, e.g. - Operation Chaos, The NFL ownership saga, "I Hope He Fails", Michael J. Fox, etc... While ditto-heads know about these events because we attentively listen three hours a day, it is nice to be reminded of them, as they always bring back fond memories. Especially some of the older things we forget about back during the Clinton years that aren't as fresh on our minds. What was interesting to me was discovering how Rush personally feels about some of these things as they pertain to his show (not his politics); such as "Barack the Magic Negro" (by "white comedian" Paul Shanklin) is his favorite parody they've ever done on the show.
Interestingly enough we also find out a little "inside baseball" about the show and the people who make it happen, such as "Bo Snerdley" is actually James Golden and his politics were unknown to Rush when he was hired (Snerdley is actually a conservative, it's not a act. " He don't front, yo!" as the Official Obama Criticizer, Certified Black Enough100% Organic Slave Blood, might say). Additionally we find out Rush is similar to most of his listeners, in that he didn't like George H.W. Bush nor Bob Dole. During the 1992 and 1996 campaigns, he may have been seen as actively backing those candidates but in reality his attitude toward those two candidates were similar to his feelings on McCain; as Rush contends they were all essentially the same candidate: Moderate wishy-washy Republicans who stood for something other than pure Reaganism. As always, Rush was right. His relationship with "W" is also explored. He felt GWB would be more Reagan-esque in his policies than his father or Dole, and was disappointed how far "W" veered off that path after his 2004 re-election. However, they apparently do have a close friendship, even before he became president.
The most interesting part for regular listeners however, is not the recap of previous feuds or topics discussed on the show, but finding as what Rush is like as an actual person. He has always been a very private man and ambiguous about who he really is and what he REALLY thinks of himself and his success (as opposed to what his "on air" persona thinks of El Rushbo). This book cracks that shell...slightly, but really enough. Rush is a complex person in that he is very much a regular mid-western guy but apparently lives a very extravagant lifestyle; which is no surprise to someone worth close to $600 million, however he only really uses 3 or 4 rooms in his house, the rest are for his guests...he's very conscience about his guest being comfortable. When they stay on his five home estate they get the privilege of driving a black Maybach 57 S ($450,000 each) whenever they wish, wherever they wish. He also has a suit of armor, a life sized painting of himself, an exact replica of the chandelier the hung in the NY Plaza hotel lobby over his dining room table. Not my taste, but it's his money. Also, unlike most liberals, he a good tipper. The author came to discover from the wait staff at a restaurant (not Rush) he often tips upwards of $5,000 at dinner. While being interviewed by Chafets, Rush asked the question, "Do you know what bought me all this?" Before Chafets could answer, Rush proudly decreed, "Capitalism"! Rush, being the regular guy he is may also be prone to "adult language", which he apparently inherited from his father. Off air, during commercial breaks, he often call the Bamster a "f-ing liar", to which Snerdley replies "If I could lie like that, I could have any girl in the world."
Reading about his family history (they're like "royalty" in Cape Girardeau, well before Rush III was born) and how Rush (Rusty as a child) navigated several attempts as a DJ with varying success, his time as a "racial pioneer" in the marketing department in Kansas City, to his relationship with his brother were fascinating. What was most fascinating to me was Rush didn't ever really speak of politics of his political opinions until he was in his early thirties. His childhood and adult friends, such as George Brett, has no idea he was such a conservative and so skilled at articulating what it means to be a conservative.
The book is a fair portrayal of Rush, it's exactly what ditto-heads would have expected. There are some parts we may have a disagreement with the author; Chafets thinks Rush has a blind spot on race in America, or that he crossed the line when it came to "Caller Abortions" (which I still think were a brilliant piece of radio). Overall, I would say for ditto-heads it's a very satisfying book which basically confirms what we already know about Rush, or what we suspected. I would definitely recommend it to ditto-heads.
For liberals, my recommendation may be a different story. If you already have your mind may up about Rush, this book isn't for you. You'll dismiss it as an airbrushed, lying portrayal of "racist, bigot, sexist, homophobe" (which is liberal speak for any conservative) because it actually humanized him and paints him as a good person. And as most good liberals know, there are no good conservatives.
If you're on the fence about Rush or unfamiliar with him but interested, first of all, listen to him for three week...then pick up this book.
Not the Man the Media Portrays, May 25, 2010
[Note: I've changed my rating from 5 to 4, only because the more I think about it, the more I feel that the lightweight nature of the book does not push it into a 5-star category. Still a good airplane read. But not great biography. M. Alexander]
Zev Chafets new book works as a kind of corrective to the spin put on Rush by our Legacy Media. And because this book (probably for the most part) is based on Rush's cooperation with the author, the reader gets some fascinating insights into Rush.
Unlike Zev, who first heard Rush as a national radio host, I first heard Rush long before he became a national icon, and so I had exposure to him without media spin. Although I don't agree with some of what Rush says (for example, I am pro-choice and okay with gay marriage...what business is it of the government anyway?)
I lived in Sacramento, California, when Rush Limbaugh first came to town and tried out his new 3-hour radio format without guests, just his own power as an entertainer and political commentator. Nobody knew about Rush, so nobody had much of a chance to plant a manufactured picture of him before he went on the air.
A friend and I listened to his moderate conservative voice, irreverent humor, and his intelligent political commentary. He was a hit in Sacramento, and within a few years was marked to go national. We knew he would be big.
We also anticipated how he would be attacked as a far-rightwing extremist, a hate-filled conservative. Nothing could be farther from the truth, but the politics is such that implanting that image before people had a chance to hear him would guarantee that a significant portion of the audience wouldn't hear him. Unfortunartely, once people were predisposed to be convinced of the "truth" that Rush Limbaugh was extremist and hate-filled and meanspirited, they would filter their experience of him in light of that "truth."
As a side note, and to dispell the myth of Rush as a rightwing Christian extremist, in the 1980s in Sacramento, during the time when Christian evangelists were finding evil lyrics being recorded in reverse on record albums to program the Devil into the nation's youth, Rush decided to expose how ridiculous that was. (Rush's has a DJ's background, and you will notice that many of the entertainment tactics on his show are DJ-oriented).
On a Monday, he announced that to his listeners that Slim Whitman's "Una Paloma Blanca" contained such reversed lyrics. He did not play an example that day, but he seriously assured listeners that Slim Whitman's albums were a danger to the American Way of Life. Christians called up seriously believing Rush. They did not catch on that he was making fun of them.
On Tuesday, he kept the satire going and people still bought it. By Wednesday he brought in an example, which he played on the air. It was ridiculous, with a devilish voice saying, "Well, you found me, Old Beelzebub...etc" People still thought it was real.
On Thursday, finally, readers were calling up saying they knew it was a satire, astonished that the Sacramento evangelical Christian community did not recognize the satire, and finally Rush admitted that he had manufactured the whole thing to make a satirical point.
Rush was not well-liked by those Christians in Sacramento.
If you have a reactive negative response to Rush, AND you have not invested much time in actually listening to him, I would suggest that you are a victim of intentional programming. Rush is a conservative, but has intelligence and a fine sense of humor. Zev's book gives you wonderful details, even for the devoted Rush fan.
(Added from my comments)
A book like this will primarily attract longtime fans, who like me will know all the stories in it. Chafets provides a lot of ornamentation, but nothing substantively new. Which is fine. Rush is very transparent about his life, and his critics have already dug up the light amount of dirt in his life story.
Chafets writes in a conversational style. This is neither great biography in the Churchillian sense, nor it a mere pap. It strikes a nice light middle tone, and is a fast airplane-trip read. The greatest strength of this book is that Chafets has done some legwork, traveling to the cities Rush inhabited, speaking with people from his past and present, quoting conversations, as well as current conversations with Rush. The book is only gently chronological, jumping around in time, especially in the second half. It has an index that is good enough, and reads quite well on my iPad's iBook app. (Not available in Kindle yet.)
RICK "SHAQ" GOLDSTEIN SAYS: "HE COULD VANQUISH HIS CRITICS *WITH HALF-HIS-BRAIN TIED BEHIND HIS BACK, JUST TO MAKE IT FAIR*", May 27, 2010
Combining historical data along with personal interviews and emails from Rush himself... author Zev Chafets has fashioned a detailed narrative of Rush Limbaugh's life from childhood to his current day *MEGA-STAR* status. While unabashedly admitting in the opening that the first time he heard Rush on the radio was akin to the first time he saw Elvis on TV... I found it refreshing that the author did not try to cover-up Limbaugh's gaffes whether public or private. Along with following Rush's life steps from Missouri... to Pennsylvania... to California... to New York... to Florida... and everywhere in between... this remarkably free-flowing easy to read tale of the man that Ronald Reagan himself dubbed "THE-MOST-DANGEROUS-MAN-IN-AMERICA"... includes his prescription drug addiction... rehab... legal battles... and public embarrassment and mea culpa.
Rising from not being an overly popular teenager who worked as a disc jockey and whose life goals were more of the same... to becoming perhaps the most influential non-politician in the country... Chafets digs deep to show the influence and history of the men in Rush's family. Rush's Grandfather, Rush Sr. was a lawyer and when he retired at the age of *ONE-HUNDRED-TWO-YEARS-OLD* he was the oldest attorney working in the United States. A fact that Rush's enemies might want to take into consideration if they're hoping Rush won't be around very long. Rush's Father, Rush Junior, also a lawyer... was an absolute hero to Rush III... "AND STILL CALLS HIM THE SMARTEST MAN I EVER MET." "BIG RUSH" was a World War II combat pilot and his anti-communist opinions and the way he thought the United States should be run formed the nucleus of what Rush is today. Brother David is also a lawyer and worked out most of the deals that have made Rush a multi-multi-millionaire. One of those deals was a partnership with the former head of ABC Radio, Ed McLaughlin. "THE ARRANGEMENT MADE A FORTUNE FOR BOTH LIMBAUGH AND McLAUGHLIN." David (With Rush's approval.) is interviewed and quoted throughout the book.
Along the way to conservative radio greatness Rush worked for the Kansas City Royals baseball team for five years in a number of non-glamorous positions... and despite his non-athletic capabilities and desires... became a close friend of Hall Of Famer George Brett. Limbaugh who is famous for assigning mocking nicknames to his political enemies wasn't always known as Rush Limbaugh. At times he was known as "RUSTY SHARPE" and "BACHELOR JEFF CHRISTIE". Along with making money Limbaugh created a whole new talk radio vocabulary. His fans became known as "DITTOHEADS"... and enemies fell under many "Rushian" categories such as... "UGLO-AMERICANS"... "COMMIE PINKO LIBERALS"... "FEMINAZIS" and "TREE HUGGERS". The author as well as Rush is not afraid to step up to the plate regardless of who's pitching. The author deftly writes: "HE HAD BEEN GIVEN HIS FIRST CHANCE TO REALLY TAKE ON THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS IN 1992, WHEN TED KOPPEL INVITED HIM TO DEBATE SENATOR AL GORE ON ABC'S "NIGHTLINE". LIKE THE FIRST ALI-LISTON BOUT, IT LOOKED LIKE A RIDICULOUS MISMATCH." Following a wordy Gore screed... "KOPPEL WAS EVIDENTLY IMPRESSED." "I DON'T KNOW ANYBODY ON CAPITOL HILL WHO IS MORE KNOWLEDGEABLE ON THE SUBJECT OF ENVIRONMENT THAN AL GORE. YOU HAVE TO TAKE SERIOUSLY WHAT HE SAYS."
"LIMBAUGH DIDN'T HAVE TO AND HE DIDN'T. HE KNEW PERFECTLY WELL THAT GORE WASN'T A CLIMATOLOGIST, HE JUST PLAYED ONE ON TV."
This far sweeping montage includes not only Rush's 1994 updated "35 UNDENIABLE TRUTHS OF LIFE"... (Here's a sample of some of my favorites.) #10- "THE 1980's WAS NOT A DECADE OF GREED BUT A DECADE OF PROSPERITY; IT WAS THE LONGEST PERIOD OF PEACETIME GROWTH IN AMERICAN HISTORY." #25- "FOLLOW THE MONEY. WHEN SOMEBODY SAYS, "IT'S NOT THE MONEY," IT'S ALWAYS THE MONEY." #29- LIBERALS MEASURE COMPASSION BY HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE GIVEN WELFARE. CONSERVATIVES MEASURE COMPASSION BY HOW MANY PEOPLE NO LONGER NEED IT."... but also includes an interview (Approved by Rush.) with "Florida based-clinical psychologist, Steven Stumwasser, who specializes in treating addiction" and had Rush as a patient. Whether you love Rush... or hate Rush... this book is well worth your time.
Excellent. Not A Sycophant Author., June 1, 2010
Top reasons I liked and recommend this book:
-It discloses both the good and not good side of Limbaugh in well-written prose.
-This author writes about Rush Limbaugh's life in an objective manner and not as a fan.
-It contains facts about Limbaugh that were previously unknown (some Limbaugh would not like you to know).
-It emphasizes the facts properly and doesn't dwell on the more pedantic portions of his life too long.
-The author uses fantastic sources (including Limbaugh himself) to document events.
-The events in Limbaugh's life are just plain unusual and very interesting.
-Although I am not in agreement with him on some issues, Limbaugh is a fascinating personality.
Cancelling out Avid Readers DA Review, May 26, 2010
Since Avidreader gave the book one star without reading it; I'm giving it 5 stars since I know it will be great and at least I'm honest about what I'm doing--cancelling out Avidreader's ignorance.
Chafets is a real reporter, June 20, 2010
I have to agree with M. Alexander's review that the book is too lightweight to get a five-star rating. At just over 200 pages, it will be a one-sitting read for a lot of people, two sittings for me.
Having been in the news business myself for 25 years, I can quickly smell who's trying to render an honest report and who's pushing some kind of agenda.
Chafets is a real reporter. And there's not a lot of them left.
Part of this job is recognizing your own biases -- and everybody is biased one way or another. Armed with this knowledge, you try to sift your facts carefully and try to be as fair as you can to everybody, even those you don't agree with. A lot of the time, that just means quoting people in context. Just because I don't agree with somebody doesn't mean I need to do a hatchet job on them. And I can think of a couple occasions where I had such doubts about a person's integrity that I just held my fire -- at least until the criminal justice system finally confirmed my suspicions and I could finally go ahead and write in confidence.
Chafets' writing fits my standards for ethical journalism. He's no conservative but you can tell on every page that he's trying to make sense of his subject and do as fair and balanced a report as he can.
I finished "An Army of One" just a couple days after Chafets' 1990 "Devil's Night: And Other Tales of Detroit." Although somewhat dated, it's still worth tracking down. You can sense a little liberal bias here and there but overall, Chafets went to Detroit with his eyes, ears, and mind open.
We probably won't see the definitive Limbaugh biography in our lifetimes. Indeed, just the show transcripts could have been mined for maybe 100 pages of additional material. Still, Chafets manages to cover a lot of territory in just over 200 pages, and in a thoroughly fair and engaging manner.
Ignore the Liberals!, June 5, 2010
I just finished the book, and I thought it was very good. I particularly enjoyed reading about Rush when he's not on the radio...in private times. I wish there had been more of that. But it was enjoyable reliving Rush's past triumphs (and not so much the let-downs).
I thought the author's treatment of Rush was fair; but of course that will cause the knee-jerk liberals to claim bias. Just hearing the conservative side of an argument is considered bias by liberals.
Reading some of the other reviews, the negative ones, I see the same old tired accusations; Rush is a racist, bigot, etc. Any one who listens to Rush knows that is not true, and I think they just sound like narrow minded bigots themselves. I think a lot of conservatives are a little tired of being called names. But that's okay; the liberals will have their heads handed to them in November with the help of El Rushbo...and I can't wait.
If you're a liberal who might be curious, this is the book for you. I consider this book to be an honest portrayal of Rush. And it's entertaining.
I highly recommend the book!
Review of John K. Wilson's Review, June 1, 2010
This is a review of the earlier review of this book by the highly liberal and absurdly biased John K Wilson, rather than a review of the book itself. Although I thought that the book was great (I did read it), I wanted to take a moment to comment on the freakishly lengthy, phony hatchet-job that Wilson did. I'm sitting here wondering if he was paid to write his review.
As an intractable sycophant for Barack Obama (Wilson's written two adoring books on his savior) and the left, Wilson's childish non-review is nothing more than a naive slam by someone with a pre-determined agenda. Wilson's also written a highly "forced" review, since he struggled to hunt up any issue--most trivial--that he could find to expand into something that he claims is important
Wilson criticizes Chafets' relationship with Rush (Obama's two autobiographies were ghost written by admirers--what a surprise!), mentions the tired old story of Rush's ancient drug use, invents nonsense implying that Chafets is a racist, criticizes a lack of endnotes and sources (does anyone care?), pretends to be surprised that "Chafets is a relentless defender of Rush," makes a confused and accusatory argument that alleges that "Chafets projects his own moderate conservative views onto Limbaugh," claims that "Chafets simply failed to ask any important questions..." (vague, damning opinion), falsely claims that "the book is also piled high with filler," makes a nonsense argument that "there's not one word in the book about Limbaugh's inept misunderstandings about the Constitution" by citing a trivial mistake (a common liberal device), whines about typos, and complains that the book is poorly researched and offers a single error as evidence.
Wilson goes on and on, picking at anything that he can find and inventing the rest. Then at the bottom of his review, he notes that he's the author of a new book, "The Most Dangerous Man in America: Rush Limbaugh's Assault on Reason."
Yes, Wilson is certainly biased, and his agenda is obvious.
Wilson's absurd opus magnum has so many false and misleading statements that it's a disgrace. I recommend that you ignore his review.
One of a kind., June 12, 2010
Most people who "know" that Limbaugh is a racist, lying hate-monger have never listened to his radio program. Similarly, these people won't read a book about him that is fair minded, accurate, informative and entertaining. Perhaps they couldn't understand either. Too bad for them, its their loss.
"I hope he fails!!", August 1, 2010
This is an excellent book if anyone wants to know who Rush Limbaugh is and why and what he does that makes him such a popular spokesman in America today.
If you have been listening to "Old Rushbo" on the EIB Network for years as I have,there is nothing in this book that will surprise you;although there are still enough interesting tidbits to make it a worthwhile read for any ardent Limbaugh fan.
One thing that did first amaze me was that so many of the Reviewers rated this book so highly.A book of this nature usually results in Reviewers giving ratings based on their political bent.I can only come to the conclusionn that very few Reviewers readers were Liberals,and in my experience to suggest to a Liberal that they should read a book about Rush Limbaugh ;would be a total waste of one's time.
There is no doubt that Limbaugh is an entertainer,and he makes no bones about it.He is also a true believer and proponent of conservative principles;and he frequently states that he is a conservative without any qualifiers.As a comparison, Democrats can't stand it when the word Liberal or Socialist is used to describe them,and they even shy away from using it.
Just for fun when I am around Liberals,and here in Canada,they are even more plentiful in the Media,Education,Government positions, and all forms of public service,and unions ;I mention Limbaugh and they turn green with hate and venom. Then I ask them if they ever listen to him,they say they wouldn't waste their time .These people are great listeners and supporters of the CBC,the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,a government and highly Liberal and Socialist slanted organ.In fact if you want to listen to Rush Limbaugh one has to go to the Buffalo radio station if you live in the Toronto area.Standard cable offerings here,offer only CNN,NBC,MSNBC,ABC,and of course CBC or as Rush would call them "The Drive -By Media",If you choose to listen to Fox---then that is a special,and you have to subscribe to it as an extra.That is what the Regulators consider fair and balanced.As a matter of fact,there is pressure to make Aljazera a regular offering with the BBC ..but never Fox News...Forget that thought!!
Limbaugh is very open with his thoughts and he never clouds things up like his oponents on the Left do.He is ready and able to debate all comers and all ideas.However;he feels and frequently states that the Left are unable to compete in the aerena of ideas and openly tells them that ,that is the reason he has virtually no copetition when it comes to Talk Shows.He had Al Franken (who failed with his highly sponsored Talk Show)on his show once,and if he wanted to learn how to be successful ,he would show him.Franken gave up and decided with the help of Soros to run for the Senate.His success and following performance in the Senate is turning out to be no better than his success with his talk show.Maybe he should go back and talk to Rush,he'll surely have some good advice for him.Just to show how adept Rush is at what he does,he had Michael Moore on his show and it was pitiful how outmached the great one from the Left was in trying to compete with Rush in "the arena of ideas.
When the Drive-By bedia took Rush's comment about how he hoped Obama would fail in his attempts to take America down the road to Socialism,Rush confronted them face on,and showed them for what they were.Although Rush knows what he believes in and never clouds it in smoke and mirrors,he is seldom wrong.
When the Media put on the blindfolds and slanted everything to support Obama;Limbaugh warned what and who Obama was all about.Limbaugh is looking more right than ever as time goes on,and there are beginning to be a lot of people who are coming to the conclusion that they didn't really know who Obama was.They should have listened to Limbaugh..and that goes for the Media too.
If you are going to critize Limbaugh,you'd best stick with the types of cigars he smokes,or what football team he backs;but in the arena of ideas,you're choosing a formidable opponent.
Over the years,Rush has stood up and been counted on many issues.
Just last week,he took on the whole business of Electric cars that "Omama Motors" and the enviromentalists are foisting on America.The Government is shovelling huge amounts of money into this dream to produce a little 4-seater car (sewing machine on wheels),costing over 40K,has a range of 40 miles(and what do you do when you get there,wait for hours to recharge it,where?) or return on its back-up engine that uses high grade gas;and wait till we find out how long the battery lasts and how much a replacement will be worth.Talk about a Socialist approach of producing a product nobody wants.All for a warped idea of an alternative to using energy sources that are readily available,and the left foolishly obstructs development.The only thing that Rush didn't say,was that he hopes they fail.He didnt have to,the future of the "Volt" will compete with the "Edsel"--remember that boondoggle?
If you don't think Rush is dead right about this,let me know me when you see John Kerry,Bonny Frank,Nancy Pelosi,Harry Read,and the rest of these Liberals trading in their Limos and Jets for a "Volt".Rush ain't fallin for this one either,and makes it clear that he is going to continue with his own fleet that he has acquired with his own money that he has earned himself,without any stimulus from any bunch of Socialists.
If you are a Conservative ,you'll enjoy this book;and on second thought,don't even tell your Liberal friends about it,they're still looking for a copy of "The New Soldier" by John Kerry.It's harder to find than an "Edsel",but in a few years you might find find the "Volt" in a museum alongside that little Nash car that could drive from the road then right into the water like a boat ,even its name escapes me now.Like the "Volt";nobody wanted it either.
... Read more
|